Monthly Archives: June 2012


I haven’t posted in a while because I’ve been pondering some feedback on this blog.

Two Christians I respect have told me that some of my critiques of my former, evangelical faith have hurt them. This was not my intent. They are from the more liberal end of the spectrum, which is not the direction at which I’ve tried to aim my remarks.

Of course, I did not intend to hurt conservatives, either. Mostly, I just want them to engage on some issues that deeply trouble me. I admit that has been a little frustrating, not just on this blog but for the years leading up to my starting it. I did allow myself to get snarky once, but — ya know — after years of unfailing politeness that gets nowhere I become ready to try another tactic. And there’s always the Beagle’s Bark label to warn away the faint of heart.

Anyway, like me, liberal Christians are troubled or even appalled at some of the alleged acts and commands of God in the Bible. Although they respect the Bible, they see it as “documenting humanity’s evolving understanding of the divine, rather than as an accurate historical record of God’s words,” as one of my correspondents put it.

In some of my posts, I’ve used language like “God says such-and-such” as shorthand for “the Bible records God as saying such-and-such.” My liberal friends rightly protest that I’m attributing things to their God that they don’t claim he said.

In other posts, I have used “Christian” as shorthand for “evangelical Christian.” Although the context would make it clear that I’m only talking about conservative Christians, my language was broader than it should have been.

So, I’ve revisited my posts to date and decided to revise several of them to use more specific language.

To the extent that my liberal friends feel some kinship with their conservative brethren, I suppose I might still give offense. I regret this, but feel it’s my duty to speak out on some issues. I hope everyone will understand.

Here are the posts I’ve revised. If you think I should revise others, please let me know.

By the way, in case you’re not sure what an evangelical Christian is, here’s the Statement of Faith of the National Association of Evangelicals. I’ve bolded the parts that, in my estimation, most distinguish them from the mainline and liberal branches of Protestantism.

  1. We believe the Bible to be the inspired, the only infallible, authoritative Word of God.
  2. We believe that there is one God, eternally existent in three persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
  3. We believe in the deity of our Lord Jesus Christ, in His virgin birth, in His sinless life, in His miracles, in His vicarious and atoning death through His shed blood, in His bodily resurrection, in His ascension to the right hand of the Father, and in His personal return in power and glory.
  4. We believe that for the salvation of lost and sinful people, regeneration by the Holy Spirit is absolutely essential.
  5. We believe in the present ministry of the Holy Spirit by whose indwelling the Christian is enabled to live a godly life.
  6. We believe in the resurrection of both the saved and the lost; they that are saved unto the resurrection of life and they that are lost unto the resurrection of damnation.
  7. We believe in the spiritual unity of believers in our Lord Jesus Christ.

Incidentally, the NAE’s Statement of Faith is very close to the Statements of Faith of the evangelical churches I attended over my 40-year stint as a Christian.

Catholics, like Protestants, come in all varieties, but I don’t know them as well. I hope my Catholic readers will evaluate whatever I say that may apply to them, and ignore the rest.